90%
Ninety percent is a solid B if you’re a student, but if you are a teacher in Pitt County School, 90% is A+ territory.
Last year the county began training all teachers in Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol. Within the SIOP initiative, they identified two particular goals: SIOP objectives (content and language objectives) in every classroom and 90% student engagement.
What it’s not
Ninety percent student engagement might be difficult to define, so let’s start with an antonym. It doesn’t mean that 27 students have their eyes open, while the other three drool on their desks. It doesn’t mean that for 83 minutes of a class period students listen to a hearty lecture on parthenogenesis.
90% Engagement in Culinary Arts
In culinary arts, where students learn the ins and outs of working in a professional kitchen, 90% student engagement often means that students spend the vast majority of a class period working in the kitchen. In Chriselyn Beresheim’s class, students wear white coats and scrub-in like culinary surgeons. They roll green fondant for elaborate birthday cakes, peel ginger for ginger carrot soup, view videos before trying new cooking techniques, and scrub pots clean, singing, talking and laughing while they work.
Ms. B’s students are as engaged as any class I’ve seen all year—90%, without a doubt. But what about that other 10%?
The concept of student engagement suggests that students are sometimes actors and sometimes receivers in their learning. If they are 90% engaged—90% actor—then they are, presumably, 10% receiver (and hopefully not 10% snoozer). This 10% might be the most important 10%. Without it, students don’t know what to act upon. If they don’t receive information about the safe preparation of chicken, somebody goes home with salmonella. At the same time, if they don’t act on their knowledge about preparing poultry, then, eventually, somebody still goes home with salmonella.
From an Education Expert
Years ago paideia pedagogue Mortimer J. Adler argued for this ratio in instruction: 15-20% Socratic seminar (students engaged in discourse about texts), 65-70% coaching (students producing while teachers guide them), and 10-15% didactic (teacher talks while students listen).
It’s not that easy
Ms. Beresheim’s class can only cook about half of their days; the rest is content heavy. And it really is heavy, just like any biology or world history class. The challenge for Ms. B is the challenge for every teacher: how to achieve a high rate of student engagement and still cover all that info? That, I believe, depends on the teacher, the course, and even the students.
Here are few things to try as you consider this goal of 90% engagement:
- As you plan ask your students, “What can my students do with this information?” How can they apply it? How can they reprocess it? What can they create with it? We aren’t talking about projects for the sake of pretty walls here. We’re talking about making your content stick in kids’ brains.
- Gather data. Better yet, invite me into your room to gather data. Tally the minutes students are actively engaged and the minutes they are receivers.
- Split your lesson plans into columns. Rather than listing only what you will teach, use one column to list what you will do and another to list what your students will do.
- Ask me about brain-based instruction. We can work on some strategies to keep kids’ minds moving without leaving the content of your course behind.
Not possible, you say!
I won’t disagree with you. Ninety percent student engagement, unless you defy your SCOS/OCOS, seems like a pretty lofty goal, but working toward it might pay off in student learning, which is the point of this whole thing to begin with. I’d love to collaborate with you in pursuit of the 90% goal. E-mail me: flinchm.rose@pitt.k12.nc.us.